16 Jul 07:33
Re: [fusion] constructing all elements of the fusion vector with the same argument
From: David Abrahams <dave <at> boostpro.com>
Subject: Re: [fusion] constructing all elements of the fusion vector with the same argument
Newsgroups: gmane.comp.lib.boost.devel
Date: 2008-07-16 05:33:33 GMT
Subject: Re: [fusion] constructing all elements of the fusion vector with the same argument
Newsgroups: gmane.comp.lib.boost.devel
Date: 2008-07-16 05:33:33 GMT
on Tue Jul 15 2008, Joel de Guzman <joel-AT-boost-consulting.com> wrote: > Stjepan Rajko wrote: > >>> How about hacking on the /lazy_sequence/ idea? Thoughts? >>> >> >> I *love it*. Attached is something... similar(I used the >> triple.cpp example as a starting point, it was pretty straightforward) >> >> What do you think? > > I Love it! I think this should be an official part of Fusion. > There are some matters though that we should consider > very well: > > 1) The concept of an infinite-sequence. > > I'm not quite happy that all sequences has a finite size. Where does that restriction come from? You know you can always give infinite sequences an (unreachable) end iterator. -- -- Dave Abrahams BoostPro Computing http://www.boostpro.com _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
(I used the
>> triple.cpp example as a starting point, it was pretty straightforward)
>>
>> What do you think?
>
> I Love it! I think this should be an official part of Fusion.
> There are some matters though that we should consider
> very well:
>
> 1) The concept of an infinite-sequence.
>
> I'm not quite happy that all sequences has a finite size.
Where does that restriction come from? You know you can always give
infinite sequences an (unreachable) end iterator.
RSS Feed