Re: [fusion] constructing all elements of the fusion vector with the same argument

David Abrahams wrote:
> on Tue Jul 15 2008, Joel de Guzman <joel-AT-boost-consulting.com> wrote:
> 
>> Stjepan Rajko wrote:
>>
>>>> How about hacking on the /lazy_sequence/ idea? Thoughts?
>>>>
>>> I *love it*.  Attached is something... similar  (I used the
>>> triple.cpp example as a starting point, it was pretty straightforward)
>>>
>>> What do you think?
>> I Love it! I think this should be an official part of Fusion.
>> There are some matters though that we should consider
>> very well:
>>
>> 1) The concept of an infinite-sequence.
>>
>>    I'm not quite happy that all sequences has a finite size.
> 
> Where does that restriction come from?  You know you can always give
> infinite sequences an (unreachable) end iterator.

Here: http://tinyurl.com/4b9m8q

The size(s), result_of::size<S> gives this restriction. The result
should be "MPL Integral Constant. Convertible to int.".

This is inherited from MPL:

http://tinyurl.com/6cbx9c

IMO, and we've been discussing this with Tobias and Dan offlist, both
MPL and Fusion should have a more relaxed concept for infinite
sequences without the "size" requirement. Or...

At the very least, both MPL and Fusion forward sequences should relax
the result type of size to allow a special "inf", "positive_inf" and
"negative_inf" types, in addition to "Integral Constant".

Regards,
--

-- 
Joel de Guzman
http://www.boostpro.com
http://spirit.sf.net

_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost