Re: [fusion] constructing all elements of the fusion vector with the same argument

AMDG

Joel de Guzman wrote:
> Yeah, I agree. All views are inherently "lazy" anyway. So it's
> not a good name. More suggestions, anyone, please? functional_view?
> computed_view?

I just looked at lazy_sequence.hpp.  Isn't it equivalent to
transform(mpl::range_c<int, 0, N>(), f)?

> Man! The fold algorithm can even be implemented in terms of this
> view. The only difference is that each "fold" is computed along the
> way. Maybe we should just call it "fold_view" ?

Awesome.

In Christ,
Steven Watanabe

_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost