Re: [fusion] constructing all elements of the fusion vector with the same argument

Joel de Guzman wrote:
> Stjepan Rajko wrote:
>> On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 7:53 PM, Joel de Guzman
>> <joel <at> boost-consulting.com> wrote:
...
> 
>> That maybe
>> suggests changing the name to something like "callable_view" (perhaps
>> there is a better variant that doesn't suggest that the view is
>> callable).
> 
> Yeah, I agree. All views are inherently "lazy" anyway. So it's
> not a good name. More suggestions, anyone, please? functional_view?
> computed_view?

 From mathematics/linear algebra:

	domain_view, field view

Jeff

_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost