Re: Boost 1.36.0 release notice

on Fri Aug 15 2008, Stefan Seefeld <seefeld-AT-sympatico.ca> wrote:

> David Abrahams wrote:
>> on Fri Aug 15 2008, Stefan Seefeld <seefeld-AT-sympatico.ca> wrote:
>>
>>   
>>> Why can't the packaging process be automatized, making it fully
>>> reproducible ? Trying to increase the amount of tests run on the final
>>> package attacs the problem from the wrong end, IMO.
>>>     
>>
>> reproducability != correctness.
>>
>> I agree that automation is a good idea, but it might also be a good idea
>> to test the results of that automation, neh?
>>   
> Indeed. My point, however, was that I would *first* automatize, *then*
> validate. The point of reproducibility is to cut down on the amount of
> (repeated) validation you have to do afterwards, no ? 

Makes sense to me.

--

-- 
Dave Abrahams
BoostPro Computing
http://www.boostpro.com
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost