Re: Boost 1.36.0 release notice

on Sun Aug 17 2008, "Robert Ramey" <ramey-AT-rrsd.com> wrote:

> My real point is that there is no reason that any tools that
> are used by boost should be treated any differently than
> any libraries used by boost.

Does that assertion have any practical implications for the issue
being discussed?

--

-- 
Dave Abrahams
BoostPro Computing
http://www.boostpro.com
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost