Re: [Review] Phoenix review starts today, September 21st

David Abrahams wrote:
> on Mon Sep 22 2008, Joel de Guzman <joel-AT-boost-consulting.com> wrote:
> 
>> David Abrahams wrote:
>>> on Mon Sep 22 2008, "Peter Dimov" <pdimov-AT-pdimov.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Mathias Gaunard:
>>>>> Loïc Joly wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> - How does this library position itself wrt the upcomming C++0x > standard,
>>>>> with native support for lambdas, and standardized support for > function or
>>>>> bind? Is it more expressive?
>>>>>
>>>>> The C++0x standard only specifies monomorphic lambdas at the moment.
>>>>> So Phoenix is indeed more expressive, since all expressions are polymorphic.
>>>> Except phoenix::bind, which is monomorphic, for whatever reasons. 
>>>>
>>>>
>> http://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_36_0/libs/spirit/phoenix/doc/html/phoenix/composite.html#phoenix.composite.bind>
>>> Hmm, that seems like it will needlessly restrict generic code.
>> Ah that one. I think that needs clarification. The note is wrong
>> and should be corrected. A bound function pointer or member function
>> pointer is only monorphic once bound (of course -- a single function
>> pointer or member function pointer is monomorphic). The same is true
>> with bind and lambda bind.
> 
> Yeah, but what about a bound polymorphic function object?  The doc makes
> it sound like passing through bind removes that polymorphism.
> 
>> Phoenix bind, like bind and lambda bind is polymorphic at the call
>> site in the sense that it can bind to any function and function
>> pointer and function object (which can be polymorphic). One problem
>> I notice now with the bind documentation of phoenix is that it
>> lacks the function object binding part.
>>
>> Noted for correction. Pardon the confusion.
> 
> I'm still confused 

You can disregard the note. It is a historic artifact from V1 and
is not accurate. Phoenix2 *can* bind to polymorphic function objects.
Example:

     struct sqr
     {
         template <typename Arg>
         struct result
         {
             typedef Arg type;
         };

         template <typename Arg>
         Arg operator()(Arg n) const
         {
             return n * n;
         }
     };

     ...

     BOOST_TEST(bind(sqr(), arg1)(i5) == (i5*i5));

Regards,
--

-- 
Joel de Guzman
http://www.boostpro.com
http://spirit.sf.net

_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost