Re: [date_time] Library status?

I don't know, but I think nobody will complain if you work on bug fixing of
Boost.DT... and then asking I you can submit it for a library update (of
course I you are interested in working on it and if you have the time).

On Sat, Oct 11, 2008 at 12:24 PM, Andrey Semashev <andrey.semashev <at> gmail.com
> wrote:

> The Boost.DateTime library is very useful, and it is unfortunate to
> admit that according to Trac report and personal experience, its current
> state is anything but good. There are long standing tickets, some of
> them are trivial to fix and have patches already attached. The most
> annoying ones are missing includes and name clashes (tickets 642, 1740,
> 1615, 2083, 2091 to name some of them). Is this library still maintained?
> _______________________________________________
> Unsubscribe & other changes:
> http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
>

--

-- 
Alp Mestan
--- http://blog.mestan.fr/
--- http://alp.developpez.com/
--- In charge of the Qt, Algorithms and Artificial Intelligence sections on
Developpez
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost