Re: [date_time] Library status?

Beman Dawes wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 11, 2008 at 6:24 AM, Andrey Semashev
> <andrey.semashev <at> gmail.com>wrote:
> 
>> The Boost.DateTime library is very useful, and it is unfortunate to
>> admit that according to Trac report and personal experience, its current
>> state is anything but good. There are long standing tickets, some of
>> them are trivial to fix and have patches already attached. The most
>> annoying ones are missing includes and name clashes (tickets 642, 1740,
>> 1615, 2083, 2091 to name some of them). Is this library still maintained?
> 
> 
> I've forwarded the above to Jeff Garland. If he doesn't respond we will
> authorize someone else to apply at least the trivial fixes.

Thanks, Beman.
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost