Re: [signals2][review] The review of the signals2 library (formerly thread_safe_signals) begins today, Nov 1st

On Saturday 01 November 2008 16:27, Frank Mori Hess wrote:
>
> As requested earlier by Vincent, I threw together a little benchmark
> program (attached) comparing the speed of boost.signals with signals2. 
> It produces the following output on a P4 running Linux:

>
> boost::signals2::signal, 10 connections, invoking 1000000 times: 0.77 s
>
> boost::signal, 10 connections, invoking 1000000 times: 0.91 s

Oops, there was an error in the benchmark program, the above two times for 
10 untracked connections were reversed.  The 0.77s time belongs to 
boost::signal, and the 0.91s time is boost::signals2::signal.

_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost