Re: [signals2][review] The review of the signals2 library (formerly thread_safe_signals) begins today, Nov 1st

What is the rationale for ditching boost::trackable?

If I were to switch from signals to signals2 in the projejct I'm currently working on,
some trackable declaration would have to be replaced by several track calls.
That would add a lot of clutter and I feel the new mechanism is more error prone.

--Johan Råde

_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost