Re: [signals2][review] The review of the signals2 library (formerly thread_safe_signals) begins today, Nov 1st

On Monday 03 November 2008 13:31, Michael Marcin wrote:
> Frank Mori Hess wrote:
> > boost::signal, 10 connections, tracking enabled, invoking 1000000
> > times: 0.78 s
> >
> > boost::signals2::signal, 10 connections, tracking enabled, invoking
> > 1000000 times: 4.92 s
>
> Over 6 times slower in this case. That seems to warrant some concern.

Almost 2 seconds of the overhead is due to atomic reference counting for 
shared_ptr.  If I compile the benchmark with DISABLE_BOOST_THREADS I get:

boost::signals2::signal, 10 connections, tracking enabled, invoking 1000000 
times: 3.20 s

Probably an similar sized chunk of overhead is due to a heap allocation 
inside the std::vector used to hold the tracked shared_ptr during 
invocation.  That part is actually something that could be optimized, at 
least for slots tracking less than some arbitrary fixed number of 
shared_ptr (say 10).

_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost