Re: Futures Review Starts Today - January 5, 2009

"vicente.botet" <vicente.botet <at> wanadoo.fr> writes:

> Anthony, I would prefer you propose for review the n2627
> interfacce. Why do you propose for review un interface that is
> outdated? It seems to me a lost of time.

I wrote the code for the boost submission 8-9 months ago, in
accordance with the then-current C++0x proposal (with a few extras)
and it has been in the review queue since. I have since focused my
energy on my commercial library, rather than on a library which may or
may not be accepted into Boost, with or without changes (especially
since there is a competing submission).

If a futures library is accepted into Boost, I will gladly work with
Braddock to update the library with any features required by the
review, including conformance to N2627.

Anthony
--

-- 
Anthony Williams
Author of C++ Concurrency in Action | http://www.manning.com/williams
Custom Software Development | http://www.justsoftwaresolutions.co.uk
Just Software Solutions Ltd, Registered in England, Company Number 5478976.
Registered Office: 15 Carrallack Mews, St Just, Cornwall, TR19 7UL, UK

_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost