Re: Futures Review - wait_for_any Concept parameters

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Anthony Williams" <anthony.ajw <at> gmail.com>
To: <boost <at> lists.boost.org>
Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2009 3:43 PM
Subject: Re: [boost] Futures Review - wait_for_any Concept parameters

> 
> Vicente Botet Escriba <vicente.botet <at> wanadoo.fr> writes:
> 
>> Please, could you give us which is the Concept for the wait_for_any
>> parameter template function? It is not clear from the documentation which
>> are the functions must be provided by the Models.
> 
> With the library as it stands, wait_for_any works with any
> specializations of unique_future or shared_future, but only those ---
> it is inherently tied to their implementation.

Oh, I see. I've missed that on the documentation which is clearly stated on the preconditions.

If this function works only for unique/shared future, its name is too generic to be placed at the boost
namespace. Do you plan to include it in a specific futures namespace?

Vicente

_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost