27 Jul 01:06
Re: sorting floats by casting to integer
Steven Ross <spreadsort <at> gmail.com>
2009-07-26 23:06:44 GMT
2009-07-26 23:06:44 GMT
On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 8:37 AM, Vladimir Prus <vladimir <at> codesourcery.com>wrote: > > I'll test with SSE and other compiler settings next. Is there an easy > way > > to add these with bjam? > > Because bjam is actually a low-level build engine, it is pretty much > impossible > to do anything with it at all. Boost.Build allows you to pass any flags > to compiler you see fit, my previous post gives the actual syntax I have > used. > Thanks for the suggestion. I ended up passing those flags you suggested, and obtained this result: cl : Command line warning D9002 : ignoring unknown option '-march=nocona' cl : Command line warning D9002 : ignoring unknown option '-mfpmath=sse' I've checked and my cheap version of MSVC 8.0 apparently doesn't support sse. So I can't benchmark with your recommended options, without spending more money on a volunteer project. With default release optimizations, all 3 of my algorithms are roughly twice as fast as std::sort on randomized data. I'm stripping out denorms from the float tests because they skew results so much and aren't realistic data, and my floating-point performance improvement dropped from fantastic to reasonable. I've tested string_sort on a Dickens novel and had comparable results to random data, relative to std::sort (a little better than 2X faster). For now I'm using random bits for all my performance testing, which tends to generate long strings and I admit doesn't seem to be realistic string data, though it does test corner-cases. _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
RSS Feed