Re: [rfc] sized_array

On 8 February 2010 19:09, Tim Blechmann <tim <at> klingt.org> wrote:
> [...] in contrary to std::vector, which is only required to
> support random-access iterators (which are implementation-defined), my
> class guaranties to allocate the data in one consecutive memory area. [...]
>

As of C++03, std::vector is contiguous, so I'm not convinced by the
utility of this.
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost