9 Feb 11:09
embedded_vector (was: Re: [rfc] sized_array)
<strasser <at> uni-bremen.de>
2010-02-09 10:09:31 GMT
2010-02-09 10:09:31 GMT
Zitat von Tim Blechmann <tim <at> klingt.org>: >>> [...] in contrary to std::vector, which is only required to >>> support random-access iterators (which are implementation-defined), my >>> class guaranties to allocate the data in one consecutive memory area. [...] >>> >> >> As of C++03, std::vector is contiguous, so I'm not convinced by the >> utility of this. > > interesting ... it seems, my assumption was based on c++98 I don't think that was changed from 98 to 03. but your description reminded me of something I do think would be a useful addition to Boost.Array. a vector that resides on the stack as long as it fits in there(like a boost::array) but still supports dynamic allocation in case the vector size exceeds the reserved space. my implementation of this: template<class T,std::size_t EmbeddedSize,bool Expand=true> class embedded_vector; embedded_vector<T,Size,false> should be equivalent to boost::array<T,Size>, but if Expand==true max_size() is unlimited, with no allocation as long as size() <= EmbeddedSize _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
RSS Feed