Re: [boostbook] Supporting variadic template parameters

Daniel James wrote:
> On 02/05/2008, Douglas Gregor <dgregor <at> osl.iu.edu> wrote:
>   
>> I would suggest calling the attribute "parameter_pack" or "pack", rather
>>  than "variadic", since it's more precise. One could even do the same for
>>  <parameter name="args" pack="1">.
>>     
>
> I'll do that. Would it be also be worth adding an attribute when a
> class inherits from a pack expansion? 

Sure. If you want to be really pedantic, you could make sure that 
BoostBook supports pack and pack-expansion attributes everywhere that 
C++0x supports them, by going through the list in [temp.variadic] in the 
C++0x working draft.

    - Doug