16 Oct 11:22
Re: Doc build failure... For bjam.
John Maddock <john <at> johnmaddock.co.uk>
2008-10-16 09:22:23 GMT
2008-10-16 09:22:23 GMT
Beman Dawes wrote: >> Daniel James wrote: >>> 2008/10/11 Rene Rivera <grafikrobot <at> gmail.com>: >>>> Thank you for suggesting that! >>>> <http://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/changeset/49287> >>> >>> I'm glad you've got it working. It looks like we really need someone >>> to take responsibility for maintaining the windows boostbook build >>> tools or future problems will only be caught during the bjam release >>> process. >> >> Agreed. Who is the logical person to take responsibility? I have a working Win32 setup as well, as for maintaining it that's harder: not least because it's hard to tell when it's broken! The doxygen integration seems to be particulary flaky: often reporting success when it in fact failed, or at least mangled the outputJohn.
John.
RSS Feed