Re: Egg 2nd request for reviews

Kirit Sælensminde wrote:
> So far I think the documentation is pretty good. One thing that I 
> especially like (and I wish more of the Boost documentation would do) is 
> to list the required headers with each example.

Maybe I should put a hyperlink to example cpp file.

> I agree though that 
> adding egg:: to the egg members would probably make things clearer.

Ok.

> I like the Haskell examples for egg::nest, but didn't notice that the 
> documentation was explicit about stating it was Haskell - some probably 
> won't recognise it.

I should put some hyperlink about haskell notation.

> Really I need to have a good play around with it, but I don't know when 
> I will have time to do so :( Almost certainly not in the next two weeks 
> though.

The review manager will consider it. 

Regards,

--

-- 
Shunsuke Sogame