Re: simple question about gil

John Femiani wrote:

> 
> I've been happily using gil for a while, and it suits my needs well, but
> I think your assessment is correct in your case. It does not have not
> the best image io library (they consider io an optional extension
> actually), and it does not help with image display at all.  It would be
> nice if there was a boost graphics library..., but I guess that is to
> tricky to get right.

Thanks.  Yeah, nothing against GIL, I'm sure it does what it was 
designed for well.