30 Aug 01:58
Re: [filesystem][xpressive] Hotfix patches available for 1.36.0
Adam Merz <adammerz <at> hotmail.com>
2008-08-29 23:58:36 GMT
2008-08-29 23:58:36 GMT
Personally, I have no problems with hotfixes, but for those who prefer point releases, how about this: When a given version of Boost is at the end of its development lifecycle (i.e., when a new version of Boost is ready for release), take all the hotfixes for that version and package them into a point release, then release the point release and the new version at the same time. E.g., when Boost 1.37.0 is done, create a 1.36.1 out of all the available 1.36.0 hotfixes. This shouldn't add a significant resource burden, as the 1.36.1 package should only need a single test run (as opposed to the daily tests the new version would require) -- it's not being actively updated, should have no/minimal interface changes from the base version, and the changeset(s) making up a given hotfix have already received prior testing on trunk. To clarify, I'm advocating that individual hotfixes do not receive any automated testing, other than on trunk, as is currently done; only the point release resulting from all the hotfix changesets would need testing. The one "drawback" that I can think of is that Boost developers as a whole (i.e., more than just Beman and Ericwould need to track/categorize changesets as hotfixes, so it could take a while to get enough momentum going to make it realistic/useful. Just my 2ยข. _______________________________________________ Boost-users mailing list Boost-users <at> lists.boost.org http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users
would need to track/categorize
changesets as hotfixes, so it could take a while to get enough momentum going to
make it realistic/useful.
Just my 2ยข.
_______________________________________________
Boost-users mailing list
Boost-users <at> lists.boost.org
RSS Feed