Re: [signals2][review] The review of the signals2 library (formerly thread_safe_signals) begins today, Nov 1st

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Fabio Fracassi" <f.fracassi <at> gmx.net>
To: <boost-users <at> lists.boost.org>
Cc: <boost <at> lists.boost.org>
Sent: Monday, November 10, 2008 11:30 AM
Subject: Re: [Boost-users] [signals2][review] The review of the signals2 
library (formerly thread_safe_signals) begins today, Nov 1st

> I have a tendency to yes, because even now it is better than what we have 
> now (which is not saying that signals1 was bad!), on the other hand I 
> think that the missing documentation is crucial.

I think that a mini review would ensure that the documentation is updated as 
we expect.

Vicente