1 Jun 2012 07:49
Re: Firefox 13 Release Notes
Sailfish <REMOVECAPSsailfish <at> REMOVECAPSunforgettable.com>
2012-06-01 05:49:29 GMT
2012-06-01 05:49:29 GMT
My bloviated meandering follows what David graced us with on 5/31/2012 10:36 PM: > On 6/1/2012 1:28 AM, Sailfish wrote: >> My bloviated meandering follows what David graced us with on 5/31/2012 >> 9:52 PM: >>> On 6/1/2012 12:39 AM, Sailfish wrote: >>>> My bloviated meandering follows what David graced us with on 5/31/2012 >>>> 9:24 PM: >>>>> On 6/1/2012 12:09 AM, Sailfish wrote: >>>>>> My bloviated meandering follows what David graced us with on 5/31/2012 >>>>>> 8:50 PM: >>>>>>> On 5/31/2012 11:36 PM, Sailfish wrote: >>>>>>>> My bloviated meandering follows what David graced us with on >>>>>>>> 5/31/2012 >>>>>>>> 5:29 PM: >>>>>>>>> On 5/31/2012 7:31 PM, Greywolf wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 31/05/2012 11:00 AM, David wrote: >>>>>>>> [snip /] >>>>>>>>>>> It's new!!! It's different!!! I am afraid of change!!!.<sigh> >>>>>>>>>> That comment is unworthy of you. Just because something is new >>>>>>>>>> doesn't mean it's better. I'm fed up with change for change's >>>>>>>>>> sake. >>>>>>>>>> Novelty is no recommendation. In fact, most new things fail >>>>>>>>>> because >>>>>>>>>> they are merely different. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> And you may have noticed that I'm proposing something that is >>>>>>>>>> (unfortunately) actually new in the Firefox world: treat the >>>>>>>>>> user as >>>>>>>>>> someone who can decide for themselves what they would like to >>>>>>>>>> change and what they would like to keep. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> In other words, treat the user as an equal. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Wow! What a concept! >>>>>>>>> Sir, (I'd respectfully call you by your name but you are using an >>>>>>>>> Alias) >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> This is *not* mandatory. It is a new *feature*. You can use it >>>>>>>>> if you >>>>>>>>> chose. As can everyone else. Or you can not use it if you chose. As >>>>>>>>> can everyone else. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Nothing with this is forced on you. Or anyone else. It defaults to >>>>>>>>> off. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> In Fx13 it defaults to about:newtab which displays the most used; >>>>>>>> however, there is a small box at the upeer right corner that, when >>>>>>>> clicked, reverts it back to a blank page. >>>>>>> Thanks Sailfish. Which is what I said? A new feature? Yes or no? >>>>>>> And in >>>>>>> no way a *disaster!!!*. <sigh> >>>>>>> >>>>>> It could have been my misunderstanding, I thought you meant that >>>>>> the new >>>>>> feature for a new tab was to present a blank screen as it did in past >>>>>> releases. >>>>> The 'new' feature? 'New Tab" did that and still does. Blank New Tab for >>>>> the browser page. >>>>> >>>> With Fx13, it default to displaying thumbnails of your most often used >>>> pages; whereas, Fx12 defaults to a blank page. >>>> >>>>> The Ctrl-T feature? >>>>> >>>> That's always been the keyboard shortcut for New Tab that I recall. >>>> >>>>> If you have the 'history stuff' set to 'be gone' the the Ctrl-T shows a >>>>> plain browser page with barely visible 4x4 blank 'squares'. Else it >>>>> shows your' history' or 'often visited' sites' as 'screens' where the >>>>> "barely visible 4x4 blank 'squares'" were. Looks like a smartphone >>>>> screen. Click on me' really BIG bookmark like stuff. >>>>> >>>>> Really nice feature. For me. >>>>> >>>> Yeah, but as I mentioned in another Ron's post, since I have history and >>>> cache erased after every session, the most it will show me is what sites >>>> I've visited most during the current browser session. It's okay but last >>>> time I used New Tab in the past 6 months was when I tested out the new >>>> feature in Fx13 yesterday :) >>>> >>>Then this *disastrous* new feature does not effect you any more >>> than... >>> >>> Seriously. It annoys me to the nines when each new feature for a Mozilla >>> software is looked at as a *personal attack on ME* (whomever 'me' >>> happens to be at the time) and most of the panic is caused by the >>> Newbies, granted that they are Newbies, when panicked by the paranoid >>> 'no-nothings'. Who truly are *no-nothings* and *paranoid*. >>> >> It never affected me in any negative way and if I wasn't so >> privacy-oriented, I would actually like it. Had you assumed otherwise? > > Hmm... I think that you and I are having a strange conversation that > does not actually mean what we say. > > It has been my experience here on this list/newsgroup as of late that > 'those that do no understand have made more of what is happening than > what it actually means' and the the panic of the unknowing begins. > :_) -- -- Sailfish - Netscape Champion Mozilla Contributor Member - www.mozilla.org/credits/ Netscape/Mozilla Tips: http://www.ufaq.org/ , http://ilias.ca/ Rare Mozilla Stuff: https://www.projectit.com/
Then this *disastrous* new feature does not effect you any more
>>> than...
>>>
>>> Seriously. It annoys me to the nines when each new feature for a Mozilla
>>> software is looked at as a *personal attack on ME* (whomever 'me'
>>> happens to be at the time) and most of the panic is caused by the
>>> Newbies, granted that they are Newbies, when panicked by the paranoid
>>> 'no-nothings'. Who truly are *no-nothings* and *paranoid*.
>>>
>> It never affected me in any negative way and if I wasn't so
>> privacy-oriented, I would actually like it. Had you assumed otherwise?
>
> Hmm... I think that you and I are having a strange conversation that
> does not actually mean what we say.
>
> It has been my experience here on this list/newsgroup as of late that
> 'those that do no understand have made more of what is happening than
> what it actually means' and the the panic of the unknowing begins.
>
:_)
RSS Feed