Re: Using new jemalloc features in our code

Benjamin Smedberg wrote:
>> [...]
>
> I think you misunderstood the proposal. It requires that we always build
> jemalloc. It does *not* require that we always build jemalloc *into the
> CRT*. For those without MSVC professional, or who are bound by the GPL,
> jemalloc would be a mozilla library, e.g. libmozjemalloc.so or somesuch.

And what about enabling those people to use the Wine CRT source ?
Do you see a problem that I miss that makes it difficult ?
Also do you see a technical reason that will make the MSFT source the 
preferred default choice, even after the Wine source is usable ?

Redirecting this to dev.platform