Re: symfony nested set licence

On 5/2/07, Hans Lellelid <hans <at> velum.net> wrote:

> Thanks for contacting the list.  Others (David?) may have some
> additional comments or feedback, but I think that changing the license
> of the software to LGPL is appropriate.  As I understand it, Symfony
> uses a BSD license, which is less restrictive than our LGPL.  So, code
> that is based on code contributed to Propel under the LGPL needs to be
> LGPL (or I suppose a more restrictive license also works).

ok. i will wait until tomorrow for further comments and then change
plugin's licence.

> We definitely support sharing code, but we do want to make sure it's
> done in a way that respects the principles of open-source software.

could not agree more :)

regards,

tristan

ps : symfony's licence is MIT