21 Jun 2012 19:44
Re: Story sizes and productivity gains
Chet Hendrickson <lists <at> hendricksonxp.com>
2012-06-21 17:44:48 GMT
2012-06-21 17:44:48 GMT
Hello Paul, Please describe the process that this 'productivity measure' will be input to. What is its purpose? chet Thursday, June 21, 2012, 1:27:06 PM, you wrote: I saw a presentation by Scott Downey last night at Agile SoCal on hyperproductive Scrum teams. Downey defines a hyperproductive team as a team that achieves a 500% increase over its initial velocity, as measured in story points. I've seen Ron Jeffries recommend not using story points, instead sizing stories consistently around a couple of days, and counting stories instead of points. That's always seemed like a good idea to me, but after Downey's presentation, I was trying to think about how to measure productivity gains when sizing stories at a couple of days. To take a simple example, if I can do a story every two days, then I can do five stories in a two-week sprint. By definition (story = 2 days), I will continue to complete five stories per sprint forever. In order to demonstrate improvement over time, I would need a new measurement, e.g., value, right? Any ideas on how to measure team productivity over time using consistent story sizes? Thanks... Paul Epps -- -- Best regards, Chet Hendrickson mailto:lists <at> hendricksonxp.com Check out our upcoming CSM Plus courses <at> http://hendricksonxp.com/index.php?option=com_eventlist&Itemid=28 [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
RSS Feed