8 Feb 2007 01:11
Re: Continuous Integration Question
Slava Imeshev <imeshev <at> yahoo.com>
2007-02-08 00:11:45 GMT
2007-02-08 00:11:45 GMT
> Ah well not always. This is where queuing is not the most descriptively > precise word. Lets say you set up a system where the developer locks all > files in the codeline they are working on. As well they create a task > branch to work off. Yes you heard me correctly the lock the files on the > codeline and create a task branch. When they are done they notify the build > server of their task branch. When I say build server it does not have to be > just one server. This could be many servers, in the next version of Team > Systems they will be called build agents. Is this what Parabuild calls remote builders? http://www.viewtier.com/products/parabuild.htm > So you have this queue of task branches to be worked off. You can have a number > of build servers working in parallel to integrate. > > So this is not my idea, credit to Joe Longo. I thought it was called Developer's Branch. Though I know MS has dev branches that live unintegrated for years. Maybe that's how they are trying to increase feedback... > I would love to heard about > how it wont work. See below. You've just described how :) Integration is all good until there are no conflicts, it doesn't matter if it is a branch per change, no branches or anything else. In any case, the longer the branch stays off the target line, the bigger integration pain. I think [eBay] developers coined term "Integration Hell" for this. > The main hole I can think of is: > > Lets take notice of member foo on class bar. As well there are two task > branches. One is altering the signature of foo. The other task branch > includes types that never used foo and or new types that use foo. The first > task branch to be built after either or both of these task branches has been > merged will fail because of issues with foo. Exactly. There are ways to address this, but being surrounded by proponents of the distrustful integration serialization I better shut up :) Regards, Slava Imeshev To Post a message, send it to: extremeprogramming <at> eGroups.com To Unsubscribe, send a blank message to: extremeprogramming-unsubscribe <at> eGroups.com ad-free courtesy of objectmentor.com Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/extremeprogramming/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/extremeprogramming/join (Yahoo! ID required) <*> To change settings via email: mailto:extremeprogramming-digest <at> yahoogroups.com mailto:extremeprogramming-fullfeatured <at> yahoogroups.com <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: extremeprogramming-unsubscribe <at> yahoogroups.com <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
RSS Feed