1 Nov 2007 13:05
Agile Architecture - Follow-Up
Matt Heusser <matt.heusser <at> gmail.com>
2007-11-01 12:05:57 GMT
2007-11-01 12:05:57 GMT
I've been thinking more on that whole Agile Architecture thing ... here's some ramblings on the subject to spark debate. am a bit frazzled by the term "Software Architect." I don't think it means anything. <http://www.ddj.com/architect/184407745> Or, perhaps, to put it another way: Perhaps it means everything? The confusion of the word reminds me of the confusion over the term testing, which reminds me of Brett Pettichord's Four Schools of Software Testing. <http://www.io.com/%7Ewazmo/papers/four_schools.pdf> It occurs to me that there are at least five distinct schools of computer architecture: CPU Architecture: Highly specialized and different; slim to never confused with the items below A CPU Architect looks a lot like: An electrical engineer Exemplar: Multi-Core CPU's Systems Architecture: Interested in the technology stack used by the business for example HP/UX servers running Oracle as DB servers, linux web servers, desktop PC's with windows A systems architect looks a lot like: A director of IT services Exemplar: Service Level Agreements, Redundancy, Failover, Backups Software Architecture: Interested in implementing various strategies to solve problems, such as Session, State, Domain Logic, Polymorphism, MVC, and so on A Software Architect looks like: A highly-abstracted programmer Exemplar: UML Diagrams Organization Architect: Interested in how to seamlessly integrate people, processes and tools while speaking a common business language A Organization Architect Looks a Lot Like: A professional design-reviewer Exemplar: The Zachman Framework, "Enterprise" Architecture, The City Planning Analogy Consulting Architecture: Interested in helping the customer and technical staff reach a shared understanding of the work, breaking the work up into manageable chunks, helping the customer understand the solution, and sticking around to see the solution implemented. A Consulting Architect looks a lot like: What we used to call a 'systems analyst' in the 1980's Exemplar: Story-Cards and a release schedule This is really just a conceptual framework. Thus, when I get into arguments about the meanings of the word "Architecture", I can say "Oh, wait, you're coming from the consulting school" and do translation. (This can explain a lot of the conflicts I've gotten in where, for example, I realized a consulting architect wasn't really technical or an organizational architect stood up and said "This isn't really an architecture question" and stepped out while we were planning the systems infrastructure.) But what do you think? -- -- Matthew Heusser, Blog: http://xndev.blogspot.com "Objectivity cannot be equated with mental blankness; rather, objectivity resides in recognizing your preferences and then subjecting them to especially harsh scrutiny and also in a willingness to revise or abandon your theories when the tests fail (as they usually do)." - Stephen Jay Gould [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] To Post a message, send it to: extremeprogramming <at> eGroups.com To Unsubscribe, send a blank message to: extremeprogramming-unsubscribe <at> eGroups.com ad-free courtesy of objectmentor.com
RSS Feed