Re: Re: Technical quality advocator

Hello, Inanc.  On Friday, October 2, 2009, at 3:00:27 AM, you
wrote:

> I agree. Can we come to a conclusion from what you have written:
> SM should strive for an understanding of the risk involved to the
> all parties (stakeholders etc) even PO is trying to withold the information?

Everyone should understand everything in an ideal world. But what's
this about the PO withholding information? If that's happening it is
probably your biggest problem.

Ron Jeffries
www.XProgramming.com
www.xprogramming.com/blog
A man hears what he wants to hear, and disregards the rest. -- Paul Simon

------------------------------------

To Post a message, send it to:   scrumdevelopment <at> eGroups.com
To Unsubscribe, send a blank message to: scrumdevelopment-unsubscribe <at> eGroups.comYahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/scrumdevelopment/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/scrumdevelopment/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:scrumdevelopment-digest <at> yahoogroups.com 
    mailto:scrumdevelopment-fullfeatured <at> yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    scrumdevelopment-unsubscribe <at> yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/