RE: Re: Maximum Size of Scrum Team

I guess I wasn't clear. We didn't ask each individual person the 3 questions, we asked the 3 questions about
the active backlog items. Since we typically had 3-5 active backlog items 10 min was plenty of time.

This was an optimization for this particular team as classic stand-ups were taking in excess of 20 min, yet
there wasn't any real reason to break the team up.

Wayne

________________________________

From: scrumdevelopment <at> yahoogroups.com on behalf of David H.
Sent: Thu 6/30/2005 2:58 AM
To: scrumdevelopment <at> yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [scrumdevelopment] Re: Maximum Size of Scrum Team

On 6/30/05, Wayne Allen <wallen <at> corillian.com> wrote:
> I had a similar experience with a team of 20. We did change our standup
> focus from the individual to the backlog items and typically had the
> meeting in under 10 min.
>

Please do not think I am touchy, but as somone that studied
communication sciences I would like to find out how you can translate
viable information within 30 seconds?
What info did you pass on actually?
Was it anywhere close to the three questions of a daily scrum?

-d

--
Sent from gmail so do not trust this communication.
Do not send me sensitive information here, ask for my none-gmail accounts.

To Post a message, send it to:   scrumdevelopment <at> eGroups.com
To Unsubscribe, send a blank message to: scrumdevelopment-unsubscribe <at> eGroups.com
Yahoo! Groups Links

To Post a message, send it to:   scrumdevelopment <at> eGroups.com
To Unsubscribe, send a blank message to: scrumdevelopment-unsubscribe <at> eGroups.com 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/scrumdevelopment/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    scrumdevelopment-unsubscribe <at> yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/