10 Jul 2010 02:43
Re: next step towards continuous integration?
Charlie Poole <charlie <at> pooleconsulting.com>
2010-07-10 00:43:50 GMT
2010-07-10 00:43:50 GMT
+1 to Adam It's really not about tools and introduction of a new tool before the need for it is strongly felt by _everyone_ can be quite disruptive. Charlie On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 5:33 PM, Adam Sroka <adam.sroka <at> gmail.com> wrote: > The only thing wrong is the "rarely" part. Start by asking everyone to do it > at least a few times a day. Get in the habit of doing that. Then see if you > can do it even more often. *Only then* worry about finding a more efficient > tool. > > On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 5:23 PM, Alan Baljeu <alanbaljeu <at> yahoo.com> wrote: > >> >> >> Process: Whenever we think of it (rarely), we go to the machine and run >> some >> scripts and/or look at results. >> >> No, I don't think we have everything yet.>> >> Alan Baljeu >> >> >> ----- Original Message ---- >> From: Adam Sroka <adam.sroka <at> gmail.com <adam.sroka%40gmail.com>> >> To: testdrivendevelopment <at> yahoogroups.com<testdrivendevelopment%40yahoogroups.com> >> Sent: Fri, July 9, 2010 4:36:17 PM >> Subject: Re: [TDD] next step towards continuous integration? >> >> Sounds like you already have everything you need. How are you using the >> "dedicated machine" currently? What does the process look like? >> >> On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 7:01 AM, Alan Baljeu <alanbaljeu <at> yahoo.com<alanbaljeu%40yahoo.com>> >> wrote: >> >> > >> > >> > We now have >> > - all developers are in one room. >> > - a machine dedicated to building >> > - a fully automated build script using Powershell, >> > - a script that installs, validates the install, and runs interactive >> tests >> > >> > using AutoIT >> > - a script that runs programmer tests >> > >> > We lack: >> > - automatic launching of the build&test on check-in >> > - notifying people on errors >> > - sandboxing of changes until approved by build test system. Possibly not >> a >> > >> > problem. >> > - Anything else missing? >> > >> > What should we do next, and how can we make it happen? >> > >> > Alan Baljeu >> > >> > >> > >> >> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] >> >> ------------------------------------ >> >> Yahoo! Groups Links >> >> >> > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > > ------------------------------------ > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > ------------------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/testdrivendevelopment/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/testdrivendevelopment/join (Yahoo! ID required) <*> To change settings via email: testdrivendevelopment-digest <at> yahoogroups.com testdrivendevelopment-fullfeatured <at> yahoogroups.com <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: testdrivendevelopment-unsubscribe <at> yahoogroups.com <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>>
>> Alan Baljeu
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message ----
>> From: Adam Sroka <adam.sroka <at> gmail.com <adam.sroka%40gmail.com>>
>> To: testdrivendevelopment <at> yahoogroups.com<testdrivendevelopment%40yahoogroups.com>
>> Sent: Fri, July 9, 2010 4:36:17 PM
>> Subject: Re: [TDD] next step towards continuous integration?
>>
>> Sounds like you already have everything you need. How are you using the
>> "dedicated machine" currently? What does the process look like?
>>
>> On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 7:01 AM, Alan Baljeu <alanbaljeu <at> yahoo.com<alanbaljeu%40yahoo.com>>
>> wrote:
>>
>> >
>> >
>> > We now have
>> > - all developers are in one room.
>> > - a machine dedicated to building
>> > - a fully automated build script using Powershell,
>> > - a script that installs, validates the install, and runs interactive
>> tests
>> >
>> > using AutoIT
>> > - a script that runs programmer tests
>> >
>> > We lack:
>> > - automatic launching of the build&test on check-in
>> > - notifying people on errors
>> > - sandboxing of changes until approved by build test system. Possibly not
>> a
>> >
>> > problem.
>> > - Anything else missing?
>> >
>> > What should we do next, and how can we make it happen?
>> >
>> > Alan Baljeu
>> >
>> >
>> >
>>
>> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>>
>> ------------------------------------
>>
>> Yahoo! Groups Links
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
RSS Feed