Home
Reading
Searching
Subscribe
Sponsors
Statistics
Posting
Contact
Spam
Lists
Links
About
Hosting
Filtering
Features Download
Marketing
Archives
FAQ
Blog
 
Gmane
From: ofri raviv <ofri.raviv <at> gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Silly Python riddle
Newsgroups: gmane.comp.python.israel
Date: Saturday 17th December 2011 13:04:43 UTC (over 5 years ago)
my trivial 13 char solution is
);g=lambda:(0
which gives
f = lambda: g(*);g=lambda:(0*)
but i'm sure this can be done with less...

On Sat, Dec 17, 2011 at 2:56 PM, Ram Rachum  wrote:

> Of course you can put a function call inside a lambda:
>
> >>> f = lambda: sum((1, 2, 3))
>> >>> f()
>> 6
>
>
> No easter eggs or JIT magic are involved in this riddle.
>
> On Sat, Dec 17, 2011 at 2:55 PM, asaf greenberg
wrote:
>
>>  On 17/12/2011 14:14, Ram Rachum wrote:
>>
>> f = lambda: g(*???*)
>>
>> i didn't know lambdas can be used with a function call.
>>
>> actaully - i can't even use lambda: f() at all, even without your
>> restrictions.
>>
>> unless there's a jit compiler easter egg built in, like lambda g('if
this
>> string then return a 3d-maze with pictures of the developers')...
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Python-il mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://hamakor.org.il/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/python-il
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Python-il mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://hamakor.org.il/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/python-il
>
>
 
CD: 21ms