20 Feb 2012 18:24
Re: Proposed Roadmap Overview
Matthieu Brucher <matthieu.brucher <at> gmail.com>
2012-02-20 17:24:44 GMT
2012-02-20 17:24:44 GMT
2012/2/19 Matthew Brett <matthew.brett <at> gmail.com>
Some of us are C developers, other are C++. It will depend on the background of each of us.
Hi,The worry as I understand it is that a C++ rewrite might make the
On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 8:38 PM, Travis Oliphant <travis <at> continuum.io> wrote:
> We will need to see examples of what Mark is talking about and clarify some
> of the compiler issues. Certainly there is some risk that once code is
> written that it will be tempting to just use it. Other approaches are
> certainly worth exploring in the mean-time, but C++ has some strong
> arguments for it.
numpy core effectively a read-only project for anyone but Mark. Do
you have any feeling for whether that is likely?
Some of us are C developers, other are C++. It will depend on the background of each of us.
How would numpylib compare to libraries like eigen? How likely do you
think it would be that unrelated projects would use numpylib rather
than eigen or other numerical libraries? Do you think the choice of
C++ rather than C will influence whether other projects will take it
up?
I guess that the C++ port may open a door to change the back-end, and perhaps use Eigen, or ArBB. As those guys (ArBB) wanted to provided a Python interface compatible with Numpy to their VM, it may be interesting to be able to change back-ends (although it is limited to one platform and 2 OS).
--
Information System Engineer, Ph.D.
Blog: http://matt.eifelle.com
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/matthieubrucher
_______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion <at> scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
RSS Feed