9 Feb 16:30
Re: Changes to trunk/scipy/optimize
Robert Kern <robert.kern <at> gmail.com>
2010-02-09 15:30:44 GMT
2010-02-09 15:30:44 GMT
On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 08:31, <josef.pktd <at> gmail.com> wrote: > 2010/2/9 Martin Lüthi <luethi <at> vaw.baug.ethz.ch>: >> Hi >> >> At Tue, 9 Feb 2010 03:05:41 -0800, >> Jarrod Millman wrote: >>> Now the question is where is the best place for us to reference >>> external, but relevant and useful Python projects. My personal >>> feeling is that it shouldn't be in the 'see also' section of our >>> docstrings, but we don't have any official policy on that yet. So we >>> need to have a general discussion about what the general policy should >>> be. >> >> I completely understand your reasoning. However, I would still find it useful >> if there were a docstring section named "similar packages", mentioning either of >> >> a) relevant packages that are closely painfully integrated with scipy and are >> generally regarded as useful >> >> b) a link to the relevant URL of the topical software guide. >> >> Option (a) might lead to some "political" problems, which I cannot imagine >> being difficult. Option (b) would be useful in any case. While checking out >> code the Topical Software Pages or the Scipy Wiki are not the immediately >> obvious places to look for more relevant information. > > I think this would be useful on the module or scipy subpackage level > but not for the docstrings for individual functions or classes. In my > opinion, the docstring of function should provide only closely related > functions and classes for quick lookup. Extra information should go > into a different section, for example in the statsmodels docs, I > included a page with related packages. +1 > For the specific case of scipy.optimize, I think also some of the > internal See Also can be removed, since many of the docstrings are > almost a table of content of scipy.optimize, which also can be > directly seen on the subpackage level. If I remember correctly, in > some parts of scipy some weeding of umbrella SeeAlso has already > occured. +1 > On Wiki versus documentation pages, I think it would be helpful to > introduce additional descriptive sections on the scipy.subpackage > level, which could include specific Topical Software. +0.5 -- -- Robert Kern "I have come to believe that the whole world is an enigma, a harmless enigma that is made terrible by our own mad attempt to interpret it as though it had an underlying truth." -- Umberto Eco _______________________________________________ SciPy-Dev mailing list SciPy-Dev <at> scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/scipy-dev
RSS Feed