Re: Default collection class for unordered relations
Subject: Re: Default collection class for unordered relations
Newsgroups: gmane.comp.python.sqlalchemy.user
Date: 2008-05-15 18:06:24 GMT
I think Jason hits the nail on the head with his response - my first reaction on the initial post was that was splitting hairs to enforce the difference between an ordered list and an (allegedly) unordered list, but I thought it was going to be a non-starter until I read Mike's reply. It seems like overhead and unneeded complexity for what is really just a reminder. And as his iterative example points out, not a very effective reminder at that.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sqlalchemy" group.
To post to this group, send email to sqlalchemy <at> googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sqlalchemy-unsubscribe <at> googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sqlalchemy?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
RSS Feed