Re: Default collection class for unordered relations

heh, so it can be other way - type-of-collection forces order-by...
On Thursday 15 May 2008 21:29:24 Michael Bayer wrote:
> it should be considered that when you use hibernate, the collection
> type is explicit with the collection mapping itself; and when you
> use the <list> type, a <list-index> is required (which is also a
> much better name here than "order_by").   

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sqlalchemy" group.
To post to this group, send email to sqlalchemy <at> googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sqlalchemy-unsubscribe <at> googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sqlalchemy?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---