15 May 22:18
Re: Challenging relationship: many-to-many, custom join, mapped dictionary, can it work???
From: Michael Bayer <mike_mp <at> zzzcomputing.com>
Subject: Re: Challenging relationship: many-to-many, custom join, mapped dictionary, can it work???
Newsgroups: gmane.comp.python.sqlalchemy.user
Date: 2008-05-15 20:18:38 GMT
Subject: Re: Challenging relationship: many-to-many, custom join, mapped dictionary, can it work???
Newsgroups: gmane.comp.python.sqlalchemy.user
Date: 2008-05-15 20:18:38 GMT
On May 15, 2008, at 3:54 PM, Allen Bierbaum wrote: > The thing that I am missing though is an example of using > column_mapped_collection with a many-to-many relationship. Maybe I am > just a bit slow, but I can't wrap my head around how to make that work > or more specifically, how to specify it. it shouldnt be any different than using it with a one to many relationship. Unless you have additional columns in your many-to-many table, in which case you wouldnt use M2M, youd use the association pattern. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sqlalchemy" group. To post to this group, send email to sqlalchemy <at> googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sqlalchemy-unsubscribe <at> googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sqlalchemy?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
RSS Feed