Subject: Fifth Summer School on Formal Techniques, May 17-22, 2015, Atherton, California
Date: Monday 23rd February 2015 07:28:51 UTC (over 3 years ago)
[ The Types Forum (announcements only), http://lists.seas.upenn.edu/mailman/listinfo/types-announce ] [Note to moderator: The topics covered at the school are relevant to the types audience, and previous schools have been announced on the list.] Fifth Summer School on Formal Techniques May 17 - May 22, 2015 Menlo College, Atherton, CA http://fm.csl.sri.com/SSFT15 Techniques based on formal logic, such as model checking, satisfiability, static analysis, and automated theorem proving, are finding a broad range of applications in modeling, analysis, verification, and synthesis. This school, the fifth in the series, will focus on the principles and practice of formal techniques, with a strong emphasis on the hands-on use and development of this technology. It primarily targets graduate students and young researchers who are interested in studying and using formal techniques in their research. A prior background in formal methods is helpful but not required. Participants at the school will have a seriously fun time experimenting with the tools and techniques presented in the lectures during laboratory sessions. The lecturers at the school include: * Arie Gurfinkel (SEI CMU, USA): Building Program Verifiers from Compilers and Theorem Provers Abstract: Developing an automated program verifier is an extremely difficult task. By its very nature, a verifier shares many of the complexities of an optimizing compiler and of an efficient automated theorem prover. From the compiler perspective, the issues include idiomatic syntax, parsing, intermediate representation, static analysis, and equivalence preserving program transformations. From the theorem proving perspective, the issues include verification logic, verification condition generation, synthesizes of sufficient inductive invariants, deciding satisfiability, interpolation, and consequence generation. Luckily, the cores of both compilers and theorem provers are well understood, well-defined, and readily available. In these lectures, we examine how to build a state-of-the-art program verifier by re-using much of existing compilers and SMT-solvers. The lectures are based on the SeaHorn verification framework developed at CMU. * Cathy Meadows (NRL, USA): Cryptographic Protocol Analysis Modulo Equational Theories: the Maude-NRL Protocol Analyzer Abstract: In this course we give an overview of the Maude-NPA Protocol Analyzer. Maude-NPA is a tool for the symbolic analysis for cryptographic protocols. It searches for ways in which an active attacker could subvert the protocols' goals, such as authentication or secrecy. Maude-NPA is designed to take account of the algebraic properties of the crypto systems involved, in order to give a more complete representation of both the protocol and the attacker's capabilities. We give a presentation of the theory and principles under which Maude-NPA operates, and also give the students the opportunity to gain hands-on experience with the tool. * Bart Jacobs (KU Leuven, Belgium): VeriFast: Modular verification of sequential and concurrent C and Java programs using separation logic Abstract: VeriFast is a tool that takes as input a C or Java program module annotated with preconditions, postconditions, loop invariants, data structure descriptions and proof hints written in a variant of separation logic, and, without further user interaction and usually in a matter of seconds, returns either "0 errors found", or a failed symbolic execution path. If the tool reports "0 errors found" for all modules of a program, this means no execution of the program accesses unallocated memory, performs a data race, or violates any of the user-specified assertions. The tool operates by symbolically executing each function/method, using a separation logic formula to represent the state of memory, and using an SMT solver to decide proof obligations about data values. In these lectures, you will learn how to use VeriFast to modularly verify sequential and concurrent C and Java programs, and you will also learn how VeriFast operates internally, and why, if it reports "0 errors found", the program does indeed satisfy the specified properties. * Kim Guldstrand Larsen (Aalborg University, Denmark): From Timed Automata to Stochastic Hybrid Games -- Model Checking, Performance Evaluation and Synthesis Abstract: Timed automata and games, priced timed automata and energy automata have emerged as useful formalisms for modeling real-time and energy-aware systems as found in several embedded and cyber-physical systems. During the last 20 years the real-time model checker UPPAAL has been developed allowing for efficient verification of hard timing constraints of timed automata. Moreover a number of significant branches exists, e.g. UPPAAL CORA providing efficient support for optimization, and UPPAAL TIGA allowing for automatic synthesis of strategies for given safety and liveness objectives. Most recently, the branch UPPAAL SMC, a highly scalable new engine has been released supporting (distributed) statistical model checking (and synthesis) of stochastic hybrid automata (and games). The lecture will review the various branches of UPPAAL and their concerted applications to a range of real-time and cyber-physical examples including schedulability and performance evaluation of mixed criticality systems, modeling and analysis of biological systems, energy-aware wireless sensor networks, smart grids and energy aware buildings and battery scheduling. Also, we shall see how other branches of UPPAAL may benefit from the new scalable engine of UPPAAL SMC in order to improve their performance as well as scope in terms of the models that they are supporting. This includes application of UPPAAL SMC to counter example generation, refinement checking, controller synthesis, and optimization. The lab sessions will be based on exercises requiring hands-on experience with UPPAAL, UPPAAL TIGA and UPPAAL SMC (all down-loadable from www.uppaal.org). * John Harrison, Intel (Portland, USA): HOL Light --- from foundations to applications Abstract: The HOL Light theorem prover is a real-world theorem proving program with an unusually simple logical kernel. It has been used both for applictions in formal verification, especially of floating-point algorithms, and pure mathematics including the Flyspeck project's formal proof of the Kepler conjecture. We will describe how the system is built up from its low-level foundations and how it can be applied in various areas. * Natarajan Shankar (SRI CSL): Speaking Logic Abstract: Formal logic has become the lingua franca of computing. It is used for specifying digital systems, annotating programs with assertions, defining the semantics of programming languages, and proving or refuting claims about software or hardware systems. Familiarity with the language and methods of logic is a foundation for research into formal aspects of computing. This course covers the basics of logic focusing on the use of logic as a medium for formalization and proof. Information about previous Summer Schools on Formal Techniques can be found at http://fm.csl.sri.com/SSFT11 http://fm.csl.sri.com/SSFT12 http://fm.csl.sri.com/SSFT13 http://fm.csl.sri.com/SSFT14 We expect to provide support for the travel and accommodation for a limited number of students registered at US universities, but welcome applications from non-US students as well as non-students (if space permits). Non-US students will have to cover their own travel and will be charged around US$550 for meals and lodging. Applications should be submitted at the website http://fm.csl.sri.com/SSFT15 Applicants are encouraged to submit their applications before April 30, 2015, since there are only a limited number of spaces available. Non-US applicants requiring US visas are requested to apply early.