1 Sep 2004 15:52
Re: New paper on Security and Obscurity
stephane nasdrovisky <stephane.nasdrovisky <at> paradigmo.com>
2004-09-01 13:52:10 GMT
2004-09-01 13:52:10 GMT
Just a stupid tought inspired by page 7 - B: who will create the first satellite with me (i.e. for watching what's doing our ennemy / in order to know where he is)? I guess we could earn some $ if we are the first on this topic, I hope I'm not too lateIs full-disclosure includes password/shared secret disclosure ? Maybe 'full' is not the best choosen word.. It seems 'full' is limited to algorithms, and do not extend to secrets (such as passwords), what would be the use of a safe if the secret (either the code or the key) is written on the door (I know .. in case of fire, a safe is safer than the fireman and its water). It looks like computer and military security are not so different ...I'm continuing to read this paper. Scientific American / pour la science had an issue on cryptography/computer security about a year ago (no 36 of the french edition) Peter Swire wrote: > http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=531782 > > _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Is full-disclosure includes password/shared secret disclosure ? Maybe
'full' is not the best choosen word.. It seems 'full' is limited to
algorithms, and do not extend to secrets (such as passwords), what would
be the use of a safe if the secret (either the code or the key) is
written on the door (I know .. in case of fire, a safe is safer than the
fireman and its water). It looks like computer and military security are
not so different ...I'm continuing to read this paper. Scientific
American / pour la science had an issue on cryptography/computer
security about a year ago (no 36 of the french edition)
Peter Swire wrote:
>
RSS Feed