17 Oct 2001 21:18
Working IDL Rule?
Michael Gentry <mgentry <at> sharemedia.com>
2001-10-17 19:18:31 GMT
2001-10-17 19:18:31 GMT
Does anyone have a working IDL rule? I actually have a working IDL rule, but only for "simple" structures. I'm building a static library (no nested source directories) in a directory which contains both C/C++ files and some IDL files. This works just fine. However, I also have a "shared" subdirectory for creating the shared objects/library from the same C/C++ and IDL files (only the .o's and .so's go in it). This works just fine, too, but it regenerates the C++ files from the IDL files in the TOP directory (it doesn't need to do this ...), which forces uneeded re-compiles when running Jam again (as the static library is now out of date). I'm convinced it is either a gristing or dependency problem, but I'm pretty stumped as to where at the moment (I've spent a few days trying to get it all working). If anyone has a working IDL rule for this type of setup they could share, I'd appreciate it. Thanks in advance, /dev/mrg PS. I could post a lot more details if needed, but thought I'd try a more sparse approach first.
RSS Feed