Re: Conflict marking

Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:

> Well, *I* would say that's a strong indication that the code needs
> review (only half-joking). 

*grin* I hear ya.  It wasn't anything _that_ complex though. Just some 
text string changes and I knew that my version was what we had decided on.

Thanks for all your insight though.  I'll guess I'll just have to wait 
for the next round of patch theory to arrive.

In the mean time, Thomas's suggestion seems to hit the mark exactly.

--

-- 
Richard A. Smith
Bitworks, Inc