[Trac-dev] Re: make i18n practicable

-On [20080513 07:29], Christian Boos (cboos <at> neuf.fr) wrote:
>Well, IIRC, only asmodai and you shared the opinion that those 
>changesets weren't a problem, others were inclined to think more like 
>me.

And thus automatically your idea wins? Because that's what it now looks
like, especially after revising TracL10N to present your workflow.

>So I don't see the problem in presenting my arguments again, in a more
>structured way, on a discussion list were the topic can reach a wider
>audience (translators and other Trac contributors).

After you stumbling onto IRC to throw a 'noise' argument into my face,
arguing it on all fronts and now committing and changing things to already
reflect your point of view I call bullshit that you now want to 'present it
again in a more structured way'. You have an idea in your head and you just
want to enforce it even after I said I would look into it.

Have fun, good luck and best of wishes coordinating all the translations. I
can spend my time on more constructive things.

--

-- 
Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven <asmodai(-at-)in-nomine.org> / asmodai
イェルーン ラウフロック ヴァン デル ウェルヴェン
http://www.in-nomine.org/ | http://www.rangaku.org/ | GPG: 2EAC625B
If Winter comes, can Spring be far behind..?

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Trac Development" group.
To post to this group, send email to trac-dev <at> googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to trac-dev-unsubscribe <at> googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/trac-dev?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---