22 May 00:51
[Trac-dev] Re: Sphinx?
From: John Hampton <pacopablo <at> pacopablo.com>
Subject: [Trac-dev] Re: Sphinx?
Newsgroups: gmane.comp.version-control.subversion.trac.devel
Date: 2008-05-21 22:51:50 GMT
Subject: [Trac-dev] Re: Sphinx?
Newsgroups: gmane.comp.version-control.subversion.trac.devel
Date: 2008-05-21 22:51:50 GMT
Christian Boos wrote: > Noah Kantrowitz wrote: >> Yes, this was agreed on already AFAIK. All docs, docstrings, etc will >> be ReST. >> <snip> > Also, be sure to find a replacement solution for the TracIniMacro and > MacroListMacro before converting the docstrings that are used by those > macros, i.e. the Option docstrings and the docstrings of WikiMacroBase > subclasses (more generally, the return value of get_macro_description() > was also supposed to be wiki markup up to now). So, for all this stuff, I hope we're not thinking about using ReST. While standardizing on ReST may be fine for the other stuff (though I still prefer wiki markup), the IniMacro and MacroList are valuable, and doing that documentation in ReST is stupid (inmsho) -John --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Trac Development" group. To post to this group, send email to trac-dev <at> googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to trac-dev-unsubscribe <at> googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/trac-dev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
RSS Feed