27 Jun 2011 23:13
RE: [CinCV] CinelerraCV 2.1.5 back in AV Linux 5.0
Herman,
Sorry I should have been clearer... I meant the people behind AV Linux.
Nicola
Sorry I should have been clearer... I meant the people behind AV Linux.
Nicola
> To: cinelerra-0LiWvn2yMWjUKW2QJMybhA@public.gmane.org
> Subject: Re: [CinCV] CinelerraCV 2.1.5 back in AV Linux 5.0
> From: herman-0LiWvn2yMWjUKW2QJMybhA@public.gmane.org
> Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2011 22:01:07 +0200
>
> På Mon, 27 Jun 2011 21:09:45 +0200, skrev Nicola Ferralis <feranick-PkbjNfxxIARBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>:
>
> >
> > I am concerned by the lack of response to my question. As it is, I don't think AV Linux is compliant to the GPL license, since no source is available and the web pages expressively says that AV Linux is a non-GPL Linux derivative. IANAL, but I expect the developers to provide a clue to my concern, regarding the compliance to GPL. This is my personal opinion, but I think that if not compliant, Cinelerra-CV should not advertise in the cinelerra.org website a distro in plain violation of GPL.
> >
> > I am looking forward to an explanation.
>
> From Glen MacArthur (the AV Linux Maintainer that started this thread)
> or from those doing the updating of cinelerra.org?
>
> If I had an answer, I would happily speak on behalf of the latter.
> But I don't think I have enough information to answer, and I hope
> the people behind AV Linux will comment to enlighten us.
>
> --
> Herman Robak
>
> _______________________________________________
> Cinelerra mailing list
> Cinelerra-0LiWvn2yMWjUKW2QJMybhA@public.gmane.org
> https://init.linpro.no/mailman/skolelinux.no/listinfo/cinelerra
> Subject: Re: [CinCV] CinelerraCV 2.1.5 back in AV Linux 5.0
> From: herman-0LiWvn2yMWjUKW2QJMybhA@public.gmane.org
> Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2011 22:01:07 +0200
>
> På Mon, 27 Jun 2011 21:09:45 +0200, skrev Nicola Ferralis <feranick-PkbjNfxxIARBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>:
>
> >
> > I am concerned by the lack of response to my question. As it is, I don't think AV Linux is compliant to the GPL license, since no source is available and the web pages expressively says that AV Linux is a non-GPL Linux derivative. IANAL, but I expect the developers to provide a clue to my concern, regarding the compliance to GPL. This is my personal opinion, but I think that if not compliant, Cinelerra-CV should not advertise in the cinelerra.org website a distro in plain violation of GPL.
> >
> > I am looking forward to an explanation.
>
> From Glen MacArthur (the AV Linux Maintainer that started this thread)
> or from those doing the updating of cinelerra.org?
>
> If I had an answer, I would happily speak on behalf of the latter.
> But I don't think I have enough information to answer, and I hope
> the people behind AV Linux will comment to enlighten us.
>
> --
> Herman Robak
>
> _______________________________________________
> Cinelerra mailing list
> Cinelerra-0LiWvn2yMWjUKW2QJMybhA@public.gmane.org
> https://init.linpro.no/mailman/skolelinux.no/listinfo/cinelerra
RSS Feed