Tim Nicholson | 21 May 2012 10:30
Picon
Favicon

Re: Regression in mxf decoding

On 18/05/12 18:08, Tim Nicholson wrote:
> Just spotted that ffmpeg is failing to correctly determine the size of
> V210 material in an mxf wrapper. Have been running a git bisect for a
> while now and narrowed it down as follows, but have run out of time today.
> 
>[..]

OK its 70ca163bc558b2194fd9e73502bd13073c214ef5 ....

ffprobe version N-39974-g70ca163-by_Tim Copyright (c) 2007-2012 the
FFmpeg developers

[..]

    Stream #0:0: Video: v210, yuv422p10le, 720x1152, 25 fps, 25 tbr, 25
tbn, 25 tbc

Whereas the correct answer is:-

ffprobe version N-39973-gc90b8a7-by_Tim Copyright (c) 2007-2012 the
FFmpeg developers

[...]

    Stream #0:0: Video: v210, yuv422p10le, 720x576, 25 fps, 25 tbr, 25
tbn, 25 tbc

This is happening on all my samples of the BBC preservation format mxf's
at SD.

The smallest sample I have is 5 seconds worth but 154M.

I have cc'd in the interested parties.

--

-- 
Tim

Gmane