1 Apr 2009 20:29
Re: [RFC] What should pixdesc.h:write_line() do with PAL formats?
Stefano Sabatini <stefano.sabatini-lala <at> poste.it>
2009-04-01 18:29:31 GMT
2009-04-01 18:29:31 GMT
On date Wednesday 2009-04-01 02:32:34 +0200, Michael Niedermayer encoded: > On Wed, Apr 01, 2009 at 02:09:35AM +0200, Stefano Sabatini wrote: > > On date Wednesday 2009-04-01 01:47:10 +0200, Michael Niedermayer encoded: > > > On Wed, Apr 01, 2009 at 01:03:49AM +0200, Stefano Sabatini wrote: > > > > On date Tuesday 2009-03-31 23:26:00 +0200, Michael Niedermayer encoded: > > > > > On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 10:56:06PM +0200, Stefano Sabatini wrote: > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > > > read_line() currently reads from the image the components > > > > > > corresponding to c and puts them in dst: > > > > > > > > > > > > (index, c) -> comp(index, c) > > > > > > > > > > > > The inverse operations cannot be done, so maybe write_line() should > > > > > > simply take in input a list of indexes and write them down to the > > > > > > destination image, but this will not be simmetric with read_line(). > > > > > > > > > > > > To remove the asymmetry we could treat PAL formats like non-PAL ones, > > > > > > so having read_line() read the indexes and writing them to dst, while > > > > > > write_line() would write the indexes back to the image. > > > > > > > > > > possible > > > > > > > > After rethinking a bit about it I came out with this other idea, I'm > > > > simply extending read_line(), this should avoid bad code duplication, > > > > please check it. > > > > > > PIX_FMT_PAL or at least the check could then be droped > > > > Yes. > > > > ok BTW, can someone suggest a way to test it? Swscale complains with: swScaler: Palette is not supported as output pixel format and I don't know where to find a sample already in format pal8. BTW there is some specific reason for which sws doesn't support PAL8? How hard would be to implement it? Regards. -- -- FFmpeg = Fast & Fundamental Mystic Practical Erratic Game
RSS Feed