Re: Audio editing

> Juan Pablo Bouza wrote:
>> ...that it didn´t support frame rates with fractions, such as 23.976....

Christian Thaeter schrieb:
> Just a note: using floating point for framerates is almost always a bad idea.
> Rational numbers (numerator/demominator) are much better...

And additionally, could you please enlighten me what would be the prospective
use of such a fractional frame rate for audio? For everything I am aware off,
the frame rate was fixed to a limited set of values dictated by hardware,
eg. 8000, 44100, 48000, 96000, 192000, etc.

But maybe I'm overlooking an interesting use case here?

Cheers,
Hermann