27 Jun 21:30
Re: [OpenID] OpenID and SSO
From: Dick Hardt <dick <at> sxip.com>
Subject: Re: [OpenID] OpenID and SSO
Newsgroups: gmane.comp.web.openid.general
Date: 2008-06-27 19:30:19 GMT
Subject: Re: [OpenID] OpenID and SSO
Newsgroups: gmane.comp.web.openid.general
Date: 2008-06-27 19:30:19 GMT
On 27-Jun-08, at 12:25 PM, Eric Norman wrote: > > On Jun 27, 2008, at 9:25 AM, Dick Hardt wrote: > >> *if* the RP remembers the user's OpenID the first time they visit the >> site and the user only uses one OpenID on the site, then when the >> user >> returns, and if the RP autofills the OpenID in the form, then the >> user >> just has to click the submit button to login (assuming they have a >> valid session at their OP and their OP is configured to automatically >> login to that RP >> >> Lots of assumptions in this flow, definitely room for improvement. >> >> Question: do people think improving this is important? > > Well, I certainly think that the fewer actions that a user has > to perform, whether they by physical (e.g. clicking) or cognitive > (e.g. remembering), then the more riskier and less safer the login > process is from the point of view of security. This does assume > that the user has close to an accurate understanding of the action > she is about to perform. The latter is a lot more difficult to > effect then most with geek training believe. > > To reiterate, the main point here is that fewer user actions > imply less safety. Interesting logic. Does that mean that more actions is more safety? Would the security of each action not be relevant? Is "asasasasasasasasasasasasasasasasasas" a better password then "6 <at> h." because there are more keystrokes? If you make the user jump through a bunch of hoops each time they authenticate, they strive to make their life simpler, not more secure. Writing the really strong password on the sticky right beside the monitor is a classic example. -- Dick
RSS Feed