28 Jun 02:17
Re: [OpenID] Negotiating a backup OP from the current OP
From: Snorri <snorri <at> snorri.eu>
Subject: Re: [OpenID] Negotiating a backup OP from the current OP
Newsgroups: gmane.comp.web.openid.general
Date: 2008-06-28 00:17:46 GMT
Subject: Re: [OpenID] Negotiating a backup OP from the current OP
Newsgroups: gmane.comp.web.openid.general
Date: 2008-06-28 00:17:46 GMT
+1... but not easy (in the future) Do you think it's possible to establish an "OpenID Provider/Relaying Party Policy"? -Snorri -----Message d'origine----- De : general-bounces <at> openid.net [mailto:general-bounces <at> openid.net] De la part de Dick Hardt Envoyé : samedi 28 juin 2008 01:51 À : SitG Admin Cc : general <at> openid.net Objet : Re: [OpenID] Negotiating a backup OP from the current OP On 27-Jun-08, at 4:00 PM, SitG Admin wrote: > I was reading this: > http://self-issued.info/?p=75 > (Posted to the board <at> openid.net list by Mike Jones.) > > I was disturbed to see, in the first paragraph, that OpenID would be > accepted from "two" Providers; this is exactly the kind of lock-in > that will effectively *lock-OUT* the small, independent Providers. I agree. If we want to have an open web, then we need to put the choice of OP into the hands of the user, not the RPs. To do that, we need to evolve the protocol so that RPs don't feel they need to distinguish between OPs. -- Dick _______________________________________________ general mailing list general <at> openid.net http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/general
RSS Feed